Guerrier v. State
This text of 867 So. 2d 437 (Guerrier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner, Daniel John Guerrier, filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus, claiming two grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. We deny, without comment, the petitioner’s first ground, which claimed he received an illegal sentence exceeding the statutory maximum. We deny, without prejudice, the petitioner’s second ground, which claimed an incorrect sentencing scoresheet calculation, in order for the petitioner to raise this claim, if desired, in a proper rule 3.800 motion to correct illegal sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
867 So. 2d 437, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 926, 2004 WL 231141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guerrier-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.