Guerrero v. Mukasey
This text of 271 F. App'x 570 (Guerrero v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Carlos Andres Guerrero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction over Guerrero’s petition for review because he was convicted of an aggravated felony and does not raise a colorable question of law or constitutional claim. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C)-(D); Ocampo-Duran v. Ashcroft, 254 F.3d 1133, 1134-35 (9th Cir.2001) (one-year sentence for violation of CahPenal Code § 245(a)(1) constituted an aggravated felony).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 F. App'x 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guerrero-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.