Guerra, Joe v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Guerra, Joe v. State

DecidedApril 4, 2002

Docket01-01-00264-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Guerra, Joe v. State (Guerra, Joe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guerra, Joe v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

_______________

NO. 01-01-00264-CR

JOE GUERRA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 858836

O P I N I O N

Appellant pled guilty to the charge of indecency with a child. The court found appellant guilty, and assessed his punishment at 15 years confinement.

Counsel has filed a brief stating his opinion that the appeal is frivolous. The brief meets the minimum requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the records and stating why there are no arguable grounds of error on appeal. See Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Counsel certifies that the brief was delivered to appellant, and he was advised he had a right to file a pro se response. Thirty days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We hold there are no arguable grounds for appeal.

We affirm the judgment. PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Cohen and Nuchia.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI