Guernsey v. Wood
This text of 130 Mass. 503 (Guernsey v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff, at the time of the making of the contract sued on, and ever since, was a citizen of another State. The contract being in fact made by his agent in his behalf, he had the right to sue thereon. Of that right he cannot be deprived by the insolvent law of this Commonwealth without his consent. He does not give such consent by the making of a contract in this Commonwealth, either by himself or through an agent, even if the contract is to be performed here. He is not shown to have taken any part in the proceedings under the insolvent law. The fact that the certificate of discharge obtained by the defendant under that law might have been pleaded in bar of an action brought by the agent, who was a citizen of this Commonwealth, cannot make it available in this action brought by the principal, who is not a citizen of the Commonwealth and who is not bound by that law. Baldwin v. Hale, [505]*5051 Wall. 223. Baldwin v. Bank of Newbury, 1 Wall. 234. Kelley v. Drury, 9 Allen, 27. Ilsley v. Merriam, 7 Cush. 242. Fessenden v. Willey, 2 Allen, 67.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 Mass. 503, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guernsey-v-wood-mass-1881.