Gudmundson v. Axelrod
443 N.E.2d 471, 57 N.Y.2d 930, 457 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3806
Opinion
OPINION of the court
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied. Questions of fact exist as to when plaintiff’s treatment was “completed” and as to whether the August 29,1974 visit was a timely return visit within the scope of the continuous treatment doctrine enunciated in McDermott v Torre (56 NY2d 399).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gudmundson v. Axelrod, 443 N.E.2d 471, 57 N.Y.2d 930, 457 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3806 (N.Y. 1982).
443 N.E.2d 471 (Gudmundson v. Axelrod) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jajoute v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
242 A.D.2d 674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Massie v. Crawford
583 N.E.2d 935 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Grellet v. City of New York
118 A.D.2d 141 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Modzelewski v. Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center
120 A.D.2d 498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Kearney v. GVGHA (Genesee Valley Group Health Ass'n)
125 Misc. 2d 716 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)