Gudlaski v. Schwartz
262 A.D. 876, 29 N.Y.S.2d 499
Opinion
Action to recover damages for fraud in the sale [877]*877of real property. Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out defenses, consisting of new matter, in the amended answer of respondents, affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gudlaski v. Schwartz, 262 A.D. 876, 29 N.Y.S.2d 499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
262 A.D. 876 (Gudlaski v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.