Gudlaski v. Schwartz

262 A.D. 876, 29 N.Y.S.2d 499

Opinion

Action to recover damages for fraud in the sale [877]*877of real property. Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out defenses, consisting of new matter, in the amended answer of respondents, affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gudlaski v. Schwartz, 262 A.D. 876, 29 N.Y.S.2d 499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

262 A.D. 876 (Gudlaski v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.