Gudino v. Oasis Outsourcing

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gudino v. Oasis Outsourcing

931 So. 2d 253, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10420, 2006 WL 1675069

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 20, 2006

DocketNo. 1D04-5204

StatusPublished

This text of 931 So. 2d 253 (Gudino v. Oasis Outsourcing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gudino v. Oasis Outsourcing, 931 So. 2d 253, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10420, 2006 WL 1675069 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Marcelino Gudino appeals an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) enforcing a Mediation Settlement Agreement signed by the parties at the conclusion of a mediation conference. The record supports the JCC’s determination that the parties intended the Mediation Settlement Agreement to be a “full/washout settlement” of the workers’ compensation case, with payment of a monetary sum in exchange for relinquishment of “any and all claims for indemnity and medical care, past, present and future.” We are bound by this determination. See Calderon v. J.B. Nurseries, Inc., 933 So.2d 553, 2006 WL 263644 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb.6,, 2006). We note, however, that this is the extent of the settlement in this case and, as counsel for the employer/carrier recognized during oral argument, the JCC has only enforced the terms of the Mediation Settlement Agreement.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Marcelino Gudino appeals an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) enforcing a Mediation Settlement Agreement signed by the parties at the conclusion of a mediation conference. The record supports the JCC’s determination that the parties intended the Mediation Settlement Agreement to be a “full/washout settlement” of the workers’ compensation case, with payment of a monetary sum in exchange for relinquishment of “any and all claims for indemnity and medical care, past, present and future.” We are bound by this determination. See Calderon v. J.B. Nurseries, Inc., 933 So.2d 553, 2006 WL 263644 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb.6,, 2006). We note, however, that this is the extent of the settlement in this case and, as counsel for the employer/carrier recognized during oral argument, the JCC has only enforced the terms of the Mediation Settlement Agreement.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

931 So. 2d 253, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10420, 2006 WL 1675069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gudino-v-oasis-outsourcing-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack