Gude v. Does
This text of Gude v. Does (Gude v. Does) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION COREY GUDE PLAINTIFF ADC #181126 No: 4:24-cv-00532-JM-PSH
DOES DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Corey Gude filed a pro se complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on June 21, 2024 (Doc. No. 1). On June 25, 2024, the Court entered an order directing Gude to submit the full $405.00 filing and administrative fees or file a fully completed in forma pauperis application within 30 days. See Doc. No. 2. Gude was cautioned that failure to comply with the Court’s order within that time would result in the dismissal of his case. More than 30 days have passed, and Gude has not complied or otherwise responded to the June 25 order. Accordingly, the Court finds that this action should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and failure to respond to the Court’s orders. See Miller v. Benson, 51 F.3d 166, 168 (8th Cir. 1995) (District courts have inherent power to dismiss sua sponte a case for failure to prosecute, and exercise of that power is reviewed for abuse of discretion). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Gude’s complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED this 12th day of August, 2024. moa ome
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gude v. Does, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gude-v-does-ared-2024.