Guchia v. Drofdeb Operating Co.
216 A.D. 765
Opinion
Judgment upon nonsuit reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. We think the invitation to the plaintiff to come down to the seats, followed by the sudden darkening of the theatre while she was on her way, presented a question of fact for the jury. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents upon the authority of Pattison v. Livingston Amusement Co. (156 App. Div. 368).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guchia v. Drofdeb Operating Co., 216 A.D. 765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).
216 A.D. 765 (Guchia v. Drofdeb Operating Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pattison v. Livingston Amusement Co.
156 A.D. 368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)