Guchia v. Drofdeb Operating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Guchia v. Drofdeb Operating Co.

216 A.D. 765

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D. 765 (Guchia v. Drofdeb Operating Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guchia v. Drofdeb Operating Co., 216 A.D. 765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment upon nonsuit reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. We think the invitation to the plaintiff to come down to the seats, followed by the sudden darkening of the theatre while she was on her way, presented a question of fact for the jury. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents upon the authority of Pattison v. Livingston Amusement Co. (156 App. Div. 368).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment upon nonsuit reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. We think the invitation to the plaintiff to come down to the seats, followed by the sudden darkening of the theatre while she was on her way, presented a question of fact for the jury. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents upon the authority of Pattison v. Livingston Amusement Co. (156 App. Div. 368).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D. 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guchia-v-drofdeb-operating-co-nyappdiv-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack