Gubner v. Wafer
This text of 231 A.D. 857 (Gubner v. Wafer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying plaintiffs’ motion to strike out the fifth separate defense reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to serve an amended answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. The defense of estoppel is insufficient in that there is no allegation that defendants made the improvements in ignorance of the fact that Davis Realty & Construction Co., Inc., or its predecessors claimed title to the property, and no allegation that Davis Realty & Construction Co., Inc., or its predecessors knew that defendants were making improvements. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D. 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gubner-v-wafer-nyappdiv-1930.