Guarraia v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

101 A. 300, 90 N.J.L. 685, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 400
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 18, 1917·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Guarraia v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., No. 120 of the present term of this court, ante p. 682.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Rone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guarraia v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 101 A. 300, 90 N.J.L. 685, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 400 (N.J. 1917).

101 A. 300 (Guarraia v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Pennsylvania Company, C. v. Gillmore
59 A.2d 24 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Campana v. Angelini
28 A.2d 223 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Mann v. Commonwealth Bond Corporation
27 F. Supp. 315 (S.D. New York, 1938)
In Re Estate of Marchildon
246 N.W. 676 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1933)
Reed v. Taliaferro
259 P. 815 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1927)