Guarino v. Mohawk Containers Co., Inc.
This text of 450 N.E.2d 239 (Guarino v. Mohawk Containers Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff has failed to set forth any facts or circumstances from which it could be found that his use of defendant’s product was foreseeable, and accordingly summary judgment was properly granted. Inasmuch as plaintiff had deposed one of defendant’s officers and in the 17 months available had not indicated a desire for further disclosure, that he now asserts that he had not completed discovery does not interdict the grant of summary judgment (Chemical Bank v PIC Motors Corp., 58 NY2d 1023).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Judge Simons taking no part.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), . order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 N.E.2d 239, 59 N.Y.2d 753, 463 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guarino-v-mohawk-containers-co-inc-ny-1983.