Guarine v. Guarine
This text of 525 So. 2d 1037 (Guarine v. Guarine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Richard Guarine, appeals the lower court’s final judgment in this dissolution of marriage case, contending that the court erroneously awarded appellee, as a special equity, an undivided one-half interest in appellant’s interest in a home owned by appellant and his mother.
We deny appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal, finding that the lack of a transcript of the final hearing does not leave us with an inadequate basis for review of the issue raised.
We reverse the award of a special equity in the home to appellee, as appellee’s contribution to mortgage payments during the four-year marriage did not constitute a contribution “over and above normal marital duties.” See Ingram v. Ingram, 379 So.2d 955 (Fla.1980); Bolton v. Bolton, 421 So.2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Hottman v. Hottman, 418 So.2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
We note, as did Ingram and Hottman, that upon remand the trial court may make an alimony award to appellee if necessary to do equity between the parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
525 So. 2d 1037, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1362, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2366, 1988 WL 56506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guarine-v-guarine-fladistctapp-1988.