Guardian Ventures Co. v. Martin Partners, Inc.

813 So. 2d 297, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5157, 2002 WL 596740
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 2002
DocketNo. 5D01-2457
StatusPublished

This text of 813 So. 2d 297 (Guardian Ventures Co. v. Martin Partners, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guardian Ventures Co. v. Martin Partners, Inc., 813 So. 2d 297, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5157, 2002 WL 596740 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Guardian Ventures Co., appeals a temporary injunction, complaining of several procedural and substantive defects. We agree that because the findings required for issuance of a temporary injunction are lacking and because no bond was required, entry of the injunction was error. Mitts, Boyle & Associates, Inc. v. Boyle Accounting Services, Inc., 703 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

We remand for the lower court promptly to enter a proper temporary injunction or to dissolve it. In addition, we reverse the trial court’s finding in respect to the valuation date of bonus points, without prejudice to the right of the parties to argue said valuation date in the main action.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB, SHARP, W. and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitts Boyle & Associates v. Boyle Accounting Services
703 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
813 So. 2d 297, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5157, 2002 WL 596740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guardian-ventures-co-v-martin-partners-inc-fladistctapp-2002.