Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Myers

99 A.D.2d 1030, 473 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17467
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CPLR article 78 petition commenced February 23, 1984 seeking to “prohibit” respondent from further participation as a Supreme Court Justice in a lawsuit involving petitioner, unanimously denied and the petition dismissed, without costs. Respondent has not exceeded his jurisdiction nor is petitionér in any way precluded from exercising its right to challenge by appeal determinations of respondent made in exercise of that jurisdiction. Thus, a writ of prohibition will not lie. (Cf. Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d 59.) II Motion by petitioner-defendant to stay the hearing of two motions is likewise dénied. We note in passing, however, the inappropriateness of coupling a motion to punish for contempt with a motion for summary judgment. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Bloom, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Myers, 99 A.D.2d 1030, 473 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

99 A.D.2d 1030 (Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. Gottlieb
136 Misc. 2d 370 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1987)