Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Myers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Myers

99 A.D.2d 1030, 473 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17467

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 A.D.2d 1030 (Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Myers, 99 A.D.2d 1030, 473 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

CPLR article 78 petition commenced February 23, 1984 seeking to “prohibit” respondent from further participation as a Supreme Court Justice in a lawsuit involving petitioner, unanimously denied and the petition dismissed, without costs. Respondent has not exceeded his jurisdiction nor is petitionér in any way precluded from exercising its right to challenge by appeal determinations of respondent made in exercise of that jurisdiction. Thus, a writ of prohibition will not lie. (Cf. Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d 59.) II Motion by petitioner-defendant to stay the hearing of two motions is likewise dénied. We note in passing, however, the inappropriateness of coupling a motion to punish for contempt with a motion for summary judgment. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Bloom, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CPLR article 78 petition commenced February 23, 1984 seeking to “prohibit” respondent from further participation as a Supreme Court Justice in a lawsuit involving petitioner, unanimously denied and the petition dismissed, without costs. Respondent has not exceeded his jurisdiction nor is petitionér in any way precluded from exercising its right to challenge by appeal determinations of respondent made in exercise of that jurisdiction. Thus, a writ of prohibition will not lie. (Cf. Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d 59.) II Motion by petitioner-defendant to stay the hearing of two motions is likewise dénied. We note in passing, however, the inappropriateness of coupling a motion to punish for contempt with a motion for summary judgment. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Bloom, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 1030, 473 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guardian-life-insurance-co-of-america-v-myers-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack