GUARDIAN ALARM COMPANY OF MICHIGAN v. May
747 N.W.2d 283, 480 Mich. 1188
Opinion
GUARDIAN ALARM COMPANY OF MICHIGAN d/b/a Guardian Security Services, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Richard T. MAY, Bernard Schoch, David J. Marcus and Micronetics Design Corporation, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees, and
Michael Marks, John Smith, and Don Faybrick, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
GUARDIAN ALARM COMPANY OF MICHIGAN v. May, 747 N.W.2d 283, 480 Mich. 1188 (Mich. 2008).
747 N.W.2d 283 (GUARDIAN ALARM COMPANY OF MICHIGAN v. May) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.