Guardian Alarm Co of Mich v. Richard T May
This text of Guardian Alarm Co of Mich v. Richard T May (Guardian Alarm Co of Mich v. Richard T May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135635 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan GUARDIAN ALARM COMPANY OF Robert P. Young, Jr. MICHIGAN d/b/a GUARDIAN SECURITY Stephen J. Markman, Justices SERVICES,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-
Appellant,
v SC: 135635 COA: 269901 Oakland CC: 1996-525337-CK RICHARD T. MAY, BERNARD SCHOCH,
DAVID J. MARCUS and MICRONETICS
DESIGN CORPORATION,
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-
Appellees,
and MICHAEL MARKS, JOHN SMITH, and DON
FAYBRICK,
Defendants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 28, 2008 _________________________________________ s0421 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Guardian Alarm Co of Mich v. Richard T May, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guardian-alarm-co-of-mich-v-richard-t-may-mich-2008.