Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.

165 F. 488, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5398

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 165 F. 488 (Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 165 F. 488, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5398 (circtsdny 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

It appears from the registers in the clerk’s-office that several of the defendants have not filed appearance due on September rule day. Since this is the bill of foreclosure, presumably the parties in default have no defense to interpose; but in case any of them have failed to file appearance by some oversight, application for relief and extension may be made to the court, which will impose such terms as will ensure an early filing of the replication. No delays, other than such as may be necessary to ensure to each party a fair presentation of its cáse, will be tolerated; in conformity with the instructions of the Supreme Court of the United States, this cause must be pressed to a conclusion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

It appears from the registers in the clerk’s-office that several of the defendants have not filed appearance due on September rule day. Since this is the bill of foreclosure, presumably the parties in default have no defense to interpose; but in case any of them have failed to file appearance by some oversight, application for relief and extension may be made to the court, which will impose such terms as will ensure an early filing of the replication. No delays, other than such as may be necessary to ensure to each party a fair presentation of its cáse, will be tolerated; in conformity with the instructions of the Supreme Court of the United States, this cause must be pressed to a conclusion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 F. 488, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guaranty-trust-co-of-new-york-v-metropolitan-st-ry-co-circtsdny-1908.