Guaranty State Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Coal Co.

209 F. 350, 126 C.C.A. 276, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1802
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 1, 1913·No. No. 2,568·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the court below the trial judge directed a peremptory verdict for the plaintiff.

We have carefully considered all the evidence, and on principle, and in the light of well-adjudged cases, we are clear that the trial judge was correct in his ruling. Morse on Banking, § 440; Zane on Banking, § 135; Havana Cent. R. Co. v. Central Trust Co. (C. C. A.) 204 Fed. 550; Merchants’ Nat. Bank v. Nichols & Shepard Co., 223 Ill. 41; 79 N. E. 38, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 752; Honig v. Pacific Bank, 73 Cal. 464, 15 Pac. 58.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guaranty State Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Coal Co., 209 F. 350, 126 C.C.A. 276, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1802 (5th Cir. 1913).

209 F. 350 (Guaranty State Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Inner Group Financing Corp. v. Halsted Exchange National Bank
4 N.E.2d 905 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1936)
Laws v. United States
66 F.2d 870 (Tenth Circuit, 1933)