Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. James

914 N.E.2d 409, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1412
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 5, 2009·No. 2009-1679·Published

Opinion

Warren App. No. CA2009-04-038. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due September 28, 2009, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. James, 914 N.E.2d 409, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1412 (Ohio 2009).

914 N.E.2d 409 (Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.