Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance v. Norris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance v. Norris

134 S.E.2d 880, 109 Ga. App. 21, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 783

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 28, 1964

Docket40120

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 S.E.2d 880 (Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance v. Norris, 134 S.E.2d 880, 109 Ga. App. 21, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 783 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The judgment of this court in Guarantee Reserve Life Ins. Co. of Hammond v. Norris, 108 Ga. App. 45 (132 SE2d 128), affirming the judgment of the trial court, having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia on certiorari, Guarantee Reserve Life Ins. Co. of Hammond v. Norris, 219 Ga. 573, the judgment of this court is vacated and the judgment of the trial court overruling the defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in accordance with its motion for a directed verdict is reversed in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court with direction that the trial court render a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in accordance with the defendant’s motion.

Judgment reversed with direction.

Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The judgment of this court in Guarantee Reserve Life Ins. Co. of Hammond v. Norris, 108 Ga. App. 45 (132 SE2d 128), affirming the judgment of the trial court, having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia on certiorari, Guarantee Reserve Life Ins. Co. of Hammond v. Norris, 219 Ga. 573, the judgment of this court is vacated and the judgment of the trial court overruling the defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in accordance with its motion for a directed verdict is reversed in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court with direction that the trial court render a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in accordance with the defendant’s motion.

Judgment reversed with direction.

Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 S.E.2d 880, 109 Ga. App. 21, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guarantee-reserve-life-insurance-v-norris-gactapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack