Guangzhou Yongjia Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Zoomers Inc.

E.D. New York

Guangzhou Yongjia Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Zoomers Inc.

DecidedSeptember 17, 2020

Docket1:19-cv-02759

StatusUnknown

This text of Guangzhou Yongjia Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Zoomers Inc. (Guangzhou Yongjia Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Zoomers Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guangzhou Yongjia Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Zoomers Inc., (E.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GUANGZHOU YONGJIA GARMENT MANUFACTURING CO. LTD., ORDER Plaintiff, 19-CV-2759 (NGG) (LB) -against- ZOOMERS INC., Defendant. NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Guangzhou Yongjia Garment Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (“Yongjia”), a manu- facturer of apparel products, brought this action against Defendant Zoomers Inc. (“Zoomers”), which sells apparel products, seeking payment of an outstanding balance of $151,925.12 for products that Yongjia allegedly sold and delivered to Zoomers in 2015. (Compl. (Dkt. 1) ¶¶ 3, 7-12.) Pending before the court is Yongjia’s motion for default judgment, which the court referred to Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom for a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). (See Mot. for De- fault J. (Dkt. 10); June 15, 2020 Order Referring Mot.) Judge Bloom issued the annexed R&R on August 27, 2020, recommending that the court decline to rule on Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice for failure to adequately plead subject matter jurisdiction, and grant Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days of the adoption of the R&R. (R&R (Dkt. 11) at 12.) No party has objected to Judge Bloom’s R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. of Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Therefore, the court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Gesualdi v. Mack Excavation & Trailer Serv., Inc., No. 09-CV-2502 (KAM) (JO), 2010 WL 985294, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2010); La Torres v. Walker, 216 F. Supp. 2d 157, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). Having found none, the court ADOPTS the R&R in full, DIS- MISSES Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice, and GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint, with service on Defendant, by October 16, 2020. SO ORDERED. 1 Dated: Brooklyn, New York September 17, 2020

_/s/ Nicholas G. Garaufis_ NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GUANGZHOU YONGJIA GARMENT MANUFACTURING CO. LTD., ORDER Plaintiff, 19-CV-2759 (NGG) (LB) -against- ZOOMERS INC., Defendant. NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Guangzhou Yongjia Garment Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (“Yongjia”), a manu- facturer of apparel products, brought this action against Defendant Zoomers Inc. (“Zoomers”), which sells apparel products, seeking payment of an outstanding balance of $151,925.12 for products that Yongjia allegedly sold and delivered to Zoomers in 2015. (Compl. (Dkt. 1) ¶¶ 3, 7-12.) Pending before the court is Yongjia’s motion for default judgment, which the court referred to Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom for a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). (See Mot. for De- fault J. (Dkt. 10); June 15, 2020 Order Referring Mot.) Judge Bloom issued the annexed R&R on August 27, 2020, recommending that the court decline to rule on Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice for failure to adequately plead subject matter jurisdiction, and grant Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days of the adoption of the R&R. (R&R (Dkt. 11) at 12.) No party has objected to Judge Bloom’s R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. of Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Therefore, the court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Gesualdi v. Mack Excavation & Trailer Serv., Inc., No. 09-CV-2502 (KAM) (JO), 2010 WL 985294, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2010); La Torres v. Walker, 216 F. Supp. 2d 157, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). Having found none, the court ADOPTS the R&R in full, DIS- MISSES Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice, and GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint, with service on Defendant, by October 16, 2020. SO ORDERED. 1 Dated: Brooklyn, New York September 17, 2020

_/s/ Nicholas G. Garaufis_ NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Guangzhou Yongjia Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Zoomers Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guangzhou-yongjia-manufacturing-co-ltd-v-zoomers-inc-nyed-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack