Guaman v. Velez

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Guaman v. Velez

110 A.3d 927, 221 N.J. 213

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 30, 2015·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Reisner’s majority opinion reported at 432 N.J.Super. 230, 74 A.3d 931 (App.Div.2013).

Chief Justice RABNER and Justice ALBIN dissent substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Harris’s dissenting opinion reported at 432 N.J.Super. 230, 249, 74 A.3d 931 (App.Div.2013).

For affirmance — Justices LaVECCHIA, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, and SOLOMON — 4.

[215]*215For Reversal — Chief Justice RABNER and Justice ALBIN — 2.

Not Participating — Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Reisner’s majority opinion reported at 432 N.J.Super. 230, 74 A.3d 931 (App.Div.2013).

Chief Justice RABNER and Justice ALBIN dissent substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Harris’s dissenting opinion reported at 432 N.J.Super. 230, 249, 74 A.3d 931 (App.Div.2013).

For affirmance — Justices LaVECCHIA, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, and SOLOMON — 4.

[215]*215For Reversal — Chief Justice RABNER and Justice ALBIN — 2.

Not Participating — Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned).

Guaman v. Velez, 110 A.3d 927, 221 N.J. 213 (N.J. 2015).

Pincite

110 A.3d 927 (Guaman v. Velez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related