Guaman v. Velez

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Guaman v. Velez

110 A.3d 927, 221 N.J. 213

DecidedMarch 30, 2015

StatusPublished

This text of 110 A.3d 927 (Guaman v. Velez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guaman v. Velez, 110 A.3d 927, 221 N.J. 213 (N.J. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Reisner’s majority opinion reported at 432 N.J.Super. 230, 74 A.3d 931 (App.Div.2013).

Chief Justice RABNER and Justice ALBIN dissent substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Harris’s dissenting opinion reported at 432 N.J.Super. 230, 249, 74 A.3d 931 (App.Div.2013).

For affirmance — Justices LaVECCHIA, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, and SOLOMON — 4.

[215]*215For Reversal — Chief Justice RABNER and Justice ALBIN — 2.

Not Participating — Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Reisner’s majority opinion reported at 432 N.J.Super. 230, 74 A.3d 931 (App.Div.2013).

Chief Justice RABNER and Justice ALBIN dissent substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Harris’s dissenting opinion reported at 432 N.J.Super. 230, 249, 74 A.3d 931 (App.Div.2013).

For affirmance — Justices LaVECCHIA, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, and SOLOMON — 4.

[215]*215For Reversal — Chief Justice RABNER and Justice ALBIN — 2.

Not Participating — Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 A.3d 927, 221 N.J. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guaman-v-velez-nj-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack