Guadalupe Rodriguez v. State
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00595-CR
Guadalupe RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR7210 Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 1, 2014
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE NOTICE OF APPEAL DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACKOF JURISDICTION
On August 19, 2014, appellant filed a pro se Motion for Leave to File Late Notice of
Appeal, in which she states “I have not been indicted[.] It’s been over 90 days.” This court does
not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal if there is no final judgment. Also, this court’s
jurisdiction to consider an appeal is not triggered unless a notice of appeal is timely filed.
Therefore, because it appeared appellant is attempting to appeal from the alleged failure of
the State to indict her, on August 26, 2014, this court ordered appellant to show cause, in writing,
why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Our order informed appellant that 04-14-00595-CR
if no response was filed, this appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. On September 9,
2014, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record, which contains a True Bill of Indictment, but
does not contain a final judgment or an otherwise appealable order. Appellant has not filed a
response to our August 26, 2014, order; therefore, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Appellant’s motion to file a late notice of appeal is denied
Do not publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guadalupe Rodriguez v. State (Guadalupe Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.