Guadalupe Ramos v. Golden Ribbon Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 9, 2015
Docket04-15-00013-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Guadalupe Ramos v. Golden Ribbon Inc. (Guadalupe Ramos v. Golden Ribbon Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guadalupe Ramos v. Golden Ribbon Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

,"-",

C-jC'Pn K-ihbQfc I/tCfdefendant] ) IN THE O ^COURT

COUNTY, TEXAS

-o

NOTICE OF APPEAL j "Vl^— no

—i TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

tlfbbDkJ hS'fJame of each party filing notice], fjj(Cl doi p j designation], gives notice of (Xfjp^uj [his or her or its or their] intent to appeal the trial court's judgment rendered on (}/ ■ o ■ Of)l^ [date]. This appeal is taken to ff „ -? [number of the court of appeals, e.g., the Third Court of Appeals, unless appeal is taken to the First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals, in which case the notice must state that the appeal is to either of those courts, e.g., either the First or the ^-. Fourteenth CouxLof Appeals or, if a direct appeal, the Supreme Court of Texas] in . y^n PifOhlOiO ieYCtS [name of city], Texas.

[If party is represented by counsel, use following signature:]

Respectfully submitted, {,1/Jfe- f^xfifiiOj [firm name, if any] By: [signature line] *--- /l ft nil) ^) [iyped name] [address] 210- 7/4- (UQtH[telephone number] ( fJo/ (Ct . [facsimile number, if any] [state bar number]

[If party is not represented by counsel, use following signature:]

* Respectfxiily^ubmitted, q UCtO^'^P^ i^ ..fc-Q-fiiQ ^ [signature of pro se party] £, a Q pi txh-Lp t, I'C )lC\)Y\Oc> [typed name] £jj F: f~Jb \7\ (/ O 0 A-1,3if77 / 7 ft £/ ^' [adc/ress] v/0 /TQ ' ^3Cb~ [telephone number] - 01' 7 [fscsimile number, if any]

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true copy of the above Notice of Appeal has, on this day, been 11') fJ^/*?* f) [delivered in person or delivered in person by my agent or delivered by courier with receipted delivery or sent by certified mail or sent by registered mail or sent by telephonic document transfer before 5:00 p.m. of the recipient's local time] State of Texas County of Bexar

This instrument was acknowledged before me this ' day of Jbu"\ uucuTli . 20 IS bv

Personally known or )0 Produced "i as identification.

/01&S MONICA MARISSA IERMA i<-JUv k Nudity PuBlic. State ol lexas \fyf\.K'i My Commission Expires Notary Public, State of Texas ''''<'i,::,$y September 02, 2018 to f^tt/T 3 [name, address, and designation, including telecopier number if sent by telecopier, e.g., (name), attorney of record for {name of party), at - , (address)].

t->~r _ > kt. - y" r- --~~ ■""«•'-■• •; ,-v:":""o> monicamarissa lerma / /^^ [signature] '■ \ /^^A Noioty Public. State ol Texas i • ', > '.:::J-./aT.:..j My Commission Expiies Attorney for jj \^;-i,-^* September 02. 2018

[List name and address of each person served, or if person served is a party's attorney, list name of party represented by that attorney, e.g.,

Joe Jones Jones, Jones & Jones 123 Sesame Street Smalltown, Texas 77777 Attorney for Sue Smith, Plaintiff]

Source: Legal > States Legal - U.S. > Texas > Search Forms & Drafting Instructions > Dorsaneo, Texas Litigation Guide -i-i View: Full Dateffime: Wednesday, June 23,2010 - 5:03 PM EDT

j| About LexisNexis Terms & Conditions : Contact Us | LeXisNeXiS^i Copyright © 2010 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. NO.

G, Plaintiff, ■

i IN THE COUNTY COURT

o i rsa o

V. t AT LAW NO. 3 Si ■ -o

GuCcXcAu **U> i oo -V*1 ^r. ";"

AND ALL OCCUPANTS, 33»

Defendant. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS *•

JUDGEMENT

On this date came on to be heard the above-styled and numbered cause. Plaintiff appeared by authorized agent and attorney. Defendant, having been duly given notice of trial setting in the manner prescribed by law, appeared not in person without counsel, . Plaintiff/Both parties announced ready for trial without demand for jury.

After hearing the evidence and arguments of counsel, it appeared to the Court that the Defendant has forcibly detained the herein described property from Plaintiff and that Plaintiff should recover possession of the property, damages in the reasonable rental value of the property to date hereof, plus reasonable attorney's fees and costs of Court.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff recover possession from Defendant of the property described in the petition, to-wit:

That Plaintiff have its Writ of Possession, and recover from Defendant $Q. /OXS in rents due as of date hereof, damages in the sum of $<3 O^ifi . ox> , reasonable attorney's fees in the amount of $ p , costs of Court, plus interest on the amount of this Judgment and taxable court costs at the maximum rate compounded annually that is allowable by law (either per contract or statute, whichever is greater), for all of which let execution issue.

nf.ji.Ll— 1.'—

Signed and entered this day of __!„

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Guadalupe Ramos v. Golden Ribbon Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guadalupe-ramos-v-golden-ribbon-inc-texapp-2015.