Guadalupe Pacheco v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-15-00252-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
GUADALUPE PACHECO, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria Order Per Curiam
Currently pending before the Court is appellant's motion for examination of the
appellate record in the above-referenced cause. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders
brief herein and appellant has been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro
se brief. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 404 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has
the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before thirty days from the
expiration of the date of this order, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify
this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant.
See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant shall have thirty
(30) days from the day the appellate record was first made available to him to file his pro
se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days thereafter to file its response,
if any.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 5th day of August, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guadalupe Pacheco v. State (Guadalupe Pacheco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.