Guadalupe Martin Hernandez v. Thelma Jackson
This text of Guadalupe Martin Hernandez v. Thelma Jackson (Guadalupe Martin Hernandez v. Thelma Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00350-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
GUADALUPE MARTIN HERNANDEZ, Appellant,
v.
THELMA JACKSON, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
This matter is before the Court on the appellant=s failure to file a brief or reasonably
explain his failure to do so. On October 27, 2011, appellant was notified that the
reporter’s record was due on August 24, 2011, that appellant had failed to request the
reporter’s record, and that if the defect was not cured, the Court would consider and
decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. Appellant failed to respond and on December 13, 2011, the Court notified appellant that
the briefing schedule had begun.
Appellant has previously requested and received three extensions of time to file
the brief. On June 13, 2012, this Court ordered the appellate brief to be filed on or before
July 6, 2012. The order notified appellant that no further extensions would be granted
and that if the brief was not filed, the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of
prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless appellant
reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the
appellant's failure to timely file a brief.
Appellant has failed to file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR
WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b)(c).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 26th day of July, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Guadalupe Martin Hernandez v. Thelma Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guadalupe-martin-hernandez-v-thelma-jackson-texapp-2012.