Guadalupe Lopez Moreno v. State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 18, 2001
Docket07-01-00103-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Guadalupe Lopez Moreno v. State of Texas (Guadalupe Lopez Moreno v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guadalupe Lopez Moreno v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

NO. 07-01-0103-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

MAY 18, 2001

______________________________

GUADALUPE LOPEZ MORENO, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 242 ND DISTRICT COURT OF SWISHER COUNTY;

NO. B3601-0008; HONORABLE ED SELF, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Appellant Guadalupe Lopez Moreno filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal on May 10, 2001, averring that she no longer wishes to prosecute her appeal.   The Motion to Dismiss is signed by both appellant and her attorney.  

Without passing on the merits of the case, appellant’s motion for voluntary dismissal is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.   Having dismissed

the appeal at appellant’s personal request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.  

Phil Johnson

       Justice

Do not publish.

ñ-åFINAL

NO. 07-99-0223-CV

PANEL D

AUGUST 30, 1999

BRIAN MILLSAP,

Appellant

SHOW TRUCKS USA, INC.,

Appellee

FROM THE 86TH DISTRICT COURT OF KAUFMAN COUNTY;

NO. 53435; HON. GLEN M. ASHWORTH, PRESIDING

BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

Following appellant’s failure to timely file a brief in this cause, we notified him on July 21, 1999 that his appeal would be dismissed, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3, unless he responded within ten days and showed good cause for continuing the appeal.  Because of a clerical error in the July 21 notice, we again notified appellant to show good cause as to why the appeal should not be dismissed.  Appellant’s

response was due August 13, 1999.  To date, appellant has failed to respond.  We accordingly dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b) and (c).

Brian Quinn

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Guadalupe Lopez Moreno v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guadalupe-lopez-moreno-v-state-of-texas-texapp-2001.