Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. Texas Attorney General San Antonio Water System Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority The Aransas Project New Braunfels Utilities San Antonio River Authority KOC Land, LP

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 2015
Docket03-14-00393-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. Texas Attorney General San Antonio Water System Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority The Aransas Project New Braunfels Utilities San Antonio River Authority KOC Land, LP (Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. Texas Attorney General San Antonio Water System Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority The Aransas Project New Braunfels Utilities San Antonio River Authority KOC Land, LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. Texas Attorney General San Antonio Water System Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority The Aransas Project New Braunfels Utilities San Antonio River Authority KOC Land, LP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 26, 2015

NO. 03-14-00393-CV

Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, Appellant

v.

Texas Attorney General; San Antonio Water System; Texas Commission on Environmental Quality; Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority; The Aransas Project; New Braunfels Utilities; San Antonio River Authority; KOC Land, LP; O’Connor Brothers River Ranch, LLC; Ballinamona-Gafney, LP; Ballinamona, LP; Braman Ranches, LLC, Wexford Cattle Co., LLP; Martin O’Connor Ranch Ltd.; and Martin O’Connor Cattle Company, Inc, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on June 9, 2014. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the judgment. The appellant shall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. Texas Attorney General San Antonio Water System Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority The Aransas Project New Braunfels Utilities San Antonio River Authority KOC Land, LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guadalupe-blanco-river-authority-v-texas-attorney-general-san-antonio-texapp-2015.