GSFNT Recovery Fund, LLC v. Ellison

2024 NY Slip Op 32340(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedJuly 8, 2024
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 32340(U) (GSFNT Recovery Fund, LLC v. Ellison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GSFNT Recovery Fund, LLC v. Ellison, 2024 NY Slip Op 32340(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

GSFNT Recovery Fund, LLC v Ellison 2024 NY Slip Op 32340(U) July 8, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 651168/2023 Judge: Nicholas W. Moyne Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 65116 8 /2023 NYSCEF DOC . NO. 13 RE CEIVED NYSCEF : 07 / 0 9/ 2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. NICHOLAS W. MOYNE PART 41M Justice -----------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 651168/2023 GSFNT RECOVERY FUND , LLC ,AS ASSIGNEE OF MOTION DATE 03/06/2023 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 Plaintiff,

- V- DECISION + ORDER ON KEVIN ELLISON, MOTION

Defendant. ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 2, 11 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - SUMMARY IN LIEU OF COMPLAINT .

Upon the foregoing documents, it is

Plaintiff, GFSNT Recovery Fund, LLC ("GFSNT"), as assignee of Fidelity National Title

Insurance Company of New York, now moves for an order directing entry of summary judgment

in lieu of a complaint, pursuant to CPLR § 3213 , against the defendant, Kevin Ellison

("Ellison"), for the amount of the unpaid principal owed by defendant to plaintiff. On May 28,

2013, a judgment was granted in the Supreme Court of New York County with the New York

County Clerk' s Office entering judgment in favor of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company

of New York and against the defendant for the total amount of $472,615 .15 (see NYSCEF Doc.

No . 4). Plaintiff has also submitted a Notice of Assignment of Judgment and Assignment of

Judgment, executed on February 22, 2023 , in which Fidelity National Title Insurance Company

of New York assigned to GFSNT all rights, obligations, liabilities, and responsibilities with

respect to the above-mentioned May 28, 2013-judgment (NYSCEF Doc. No . 5). Plaintiff has

alleged that defendant has not paid any part of the sum to date. Plaintiff submitted its motion of

651168/2023 GSFNT RECOVERY FUND, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE Page 1 of 5 INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK vs. ELLISON, KEVIN Motion No. 001

[* 1] 1 of 5 INDEX NO. 651168/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/09/2024

summary judgment in lieu of complaint on March 6, 2023, and the "Summons and Notice of

Motion for Summary Judgment In Lieu of Complaint" in this action were personally served on

the defendant on May 11, 2023 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 12).

A CPLR § 3213 motion is used when an action is based upon an instrument for the

payment of money only or upon any judgment, and the plaintiff may serve with the summons a

notice of motion for summary judgment and the supporting papers in lieu of a complaint. CPLR

§ 3213 provides for accelerated judgment where the instrument sued upon is for the payment of

money only and the right to payment can be ascertained from the face of the document without

regard to extrinsic evidence, "other than simple proof of nonpayment or similar de minimis

deviation from the face of the document" (Target Capital 2 LLC v Sus global Energy Corp., 2024

WL 2621416 [Sup Ct, NY County 2024], quoting Weissman v Sinorm Deli, Inc., 88 NY2d 437,

444 [1996]). The usual standards for summary judgment apply on a CPLR § 3213 motion and

the movant has the burden of establishing a prima facie case by presenting an instrument for the

payment of money only and evidence of a failure to make payment called for by its terms (Matas

v Alpargatas S.A.I.C., 274 AD2d 327 [1st Dept 2000]). Additionally, renewal of a default

judgment is appropriate if it is commenced within ten years after the original judgment, and the

movant can establish prima facie showing that no part of the judgment has been satisfied

(Premier Capital, LLC v Best Traders INC, 88 AD3d 677 [2nd Dept 2011]). To establish a prima

facie entitlement for a renewal judgment, the movant must show: ( 1) the existence of an

underlying judgment, (2) that the defendant was a judgment debtor, (3) the underlying judgment

was docketed at least nine years earlier, (4) and that the underlying judgment remained partially

or completely unsatisfied (Lull v Van Tassell, 171 AD3d 1155 [2nd Dept 2019]).

651168/2023 GSFNT RECOVERY FUND, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE Page 2 of 5 INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK vs. ELLISON, KEVIN Motion No. 001

2 of 5 [* 2] INDEX NO. 651168/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/09/2024

Actions involving claims brought under CPLR § 3213 and CPLR § 5014 are related in

that a plaintiff may bring a CPLR § 5014 action for a renewal judgment as a CPLR § 3213 claim,

suggesting that an action for renewal judgment involves a claim for a sum certain (see Capital

Equity, LLC v Sunshine, 158 NYS3d 798 [Sup Ct, Kings County 2021 ]). In New York, money

judgments are enforceable for 20 years but a real property lien resulting from the money

judgment is only viable for 10 years (CPLR §§ 211 [b]; 5203 [a]). Accordingly, in response, the

Legislature enacted CPLR § 5014 to give judgment creditors the option to extend the life of a

lien by commencing an action for a renewal judgment and "permits a judgment creditor to

commence an action for a renewal judgment where 10 years have elapsed since the judgment

was originally docketed" (Premier Capital, LLC v Best Traders, Inc, 88 AD3d 677 [2nd Dept

2011], quoting Schiff Food Products, Co., Inc. v M & M Import Export, 84 AD3d 1346, 1348 [2d

Dept 2011 ]).

Here, the movant has not met his burden of establishing a prima facie case. The moving

party must present evidence that they are an "original party" to the judgment, a copy of the

original judgment, and provide evidentiary evidence that no part of the judgment has been

satisfied (Premier Capital, LLC v Best Traders, Inc., 88 AD3d 677 [2nd Dept 2011]). The

plaintiff has established the existence of an underlying judgment of which they were an original

party by submitting a Notice of Assignment of the original May 28, 2013-judgment for the

payment of $472,615.51 and have further proved that the defendant was a judgment debtor as he

was the named defendant in the original judgment (see NYCEF Doc. No. 4; 5). However,

movant has not met its burden of establishing nonpayment by the defendant regarding the

amount of the original judgment. Plaintiff has not submitted sufficient evidence to show that the

underlying judgment remains partially or completely unsatisfied, but instead, merely submits an

651168/2023 GSFNT RECOVERY FUND, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE Page 3 of 5 INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK vs. ELLISON, KEVIN Motion No. 001

3 of 5 [* 3] INDEX NO. 651168/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/09/2024

attorney affirmation from its' counsel which iterates that no part of the judgment has been paid

or satisfied (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 563 [1980] [An attorney affirmation

without a demonstration of personal knowledge of the factual matter at issue is without

evidentiary value and thus unavailing]; Ramos v New York City Hous. Auth., 264 AD2d 568,568

[1st Dept 1999]; contra. Unclaimed Prop. Recovery Serv., Inc. v Credit Suisse First Boston

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weissman v. Sinorm Deli, Inc.
669 N.E.2d 242 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Schiff Food Products, Co. v. M&M Import Export
84 A.D.3d 1346 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Premier Capital, LLC v. Best Traders, Inc.
88 A.D.3d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Ramos v. New York City Housing Authority
264 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Matas v. Alpargatas S.A.I.C.
274 A.D.2d 327 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Goldstein v. Saltzman
13 Misc. 3d 1023 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
Blue Lagoon, LLC v. Reisman
186 N.Y.S.3d 304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 32340(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gsfnt-recovery-fund-llc-v-ellison-nysupctnewyork-2024.