Gschwind, Admx. v. Viers

152 N.E. 911, 21 Ohio App. 124, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 275, 1925 Ohio App. LEXIS 238
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 30, 1925
Docket1547
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 N.E. 911 (Gschwind, Admx. v. Viers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gschwind, Admx. v. Viers, 152 N.E. 911, 21 Ohio App. 124, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 275, 1925 Ohio App. LEXIS 238 (Ohio Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

Lucia Ballantyne brought action in the Lucas Common Pleas against Mary Viers, claiming that in trying to escape from a falling limb, of a tree which stood in front of Vier’s home, she fell over a hedge, thereby sustaining injuries for which damages were sought. The judgment in the lower court was rendered in favor of Viers. Ballantyne having died in the meantime, error was prosecuted by Minerva Gech-wind, administratrix.

It was contended that the trial court erred in the admission of evidence and in its charge to the jury. It was contended that, weather bureau reports were admited into the evidence to show, the velocity of the wind and the condition of the weather. It was objected to solely upon the ground that it was immaterial. It was also contended that the court in its charge to the jury did not charge on res ipsa loquitur. The Court of Appeals held:

1. Since there was a dispute as to the date on which the accident occurred, and there was evidence tending to show that the accident occurred on different dates, the weather bureau report showing the weather condition on the afternoon of each of the days were material and therefore admissible.

2. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, though applied to falling objects such as falling buildings, trolley poles, scaffoldong etc., has never been applied to falling limbs of trees. There would seem to be a distinction in applying the doctrine to the falling of that which grows naturally, and that which is the work of man. Loomis v. Tol. Rys. & Light Co., 107 OS. 161; Cini. Traction Co. v. Holzenkamp, 74 OS. 379.

3. Since the question of contributory negligence was not plead, but raised by the evidence, the court did not err in charging the jury thereon. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hay v. Norwalk Lodge, B.P.O.E.
109 N.E.2d 481 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 N.E. 911, 21 Ohio App. 124, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 275, 1925 Ohio App. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gschwind-admx-v-viers-ohioctapp-1925.