G.S. v. State

586 So. 2d 501, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9952, 1991 WL 193116
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 1991·No. No. 91-965·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

G.S. appeals from an adjudication of delinquency for possession of cocaine with intent to sell. For the following reasons, we reverse.

The State presented no evidence at trial that G.S. was ever in actual or constructive possession of cocaine. Viewed in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that G.S. was merely a middleman in the transaction. Accordingly, we reverse on the authority of L.J. v. State, 578 So.2d 360, 362 (Fla.3d DCA 1991) (“[A] person who aids and abets a confederate in selling or delivering contraband drugs, which are physically possessed by only the confederate, may be convicted of unlawful sale or delivery of said drugs, but not of unlawful possession of said drugs.”) (citations omitted). Because G.S. was not charged with aiding and abetting the sale of drugs, he must be discharged.

Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G.S. v. State, 586 So. 2d 501, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9952, 1991 WL 193116 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

586 So. 2d 501 (G.S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

L.J. v. State
578 So. 2d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)