G.S. v. Rose Tree Media School Distric

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in G.S. v. Rose Tree Media School Distric. Read the opinion of the Court — 914 F.3d 206
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 22, 2019·No. 17-2886·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 17-2886

G.S., a minor, by his parents, J.S. and E.S.

v.

ROSE TREE MEDIA SCHOOL DISTRICT (E.D. Pa. No. 2-16-cv-04782)

ROSE TREE MEDIA SCHOOL DISTRICT

v.

E.S. and J.S., Parents and Natural Guardians of G.S., a Minor (E.D. Pa. No. 2-16-cv-04849)

Rose Tree Media School District, Appellant

Present: AMBRO and JORDAN, Circuit Judges

Motion by Amici to Convert a Not Precedential Opinion to Precedential.

Respectfully, Clerk/nmr _______________________________O R D E R ____________________________ The foregoing Motion by Amici to convert a Not Precedential Opinion to a Precedential Opinion is granted.

By the Court,

s/Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: January 22, 2019

 The Honorable Thomas I. Vanaskie, who authored the Court’s opinion in this matter, retired from the Court on January 1, 2019 and did not participate in the consideration of the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G.S. v. Rose Tree Media School Distric, (3d Cir. 2019).

G.S. v. Rose Tree Media School Distric (G.S. v. Rose Tree Media School Distric) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.