GS Holistic LLC v. Superior Smoke LLC

Opinion

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE

9 10 GS HOLISTIC LLC, CASE NO. C23-0410JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 SUPERIOR SMOKE LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14

15 Before the court is Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC’s (“GS Holistic”) motion for a 16 60-day extension of time to perfect service on Defendants Superior Smoke LLC and 17 Joseph Marquez-Ramos (collectively, “Defendants”). (Mot. (Dkt. # 8).) The court 18 GRANTS GS Holistic’s motion for an extension of time.1 19 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 requires a plaintiff to serve the defendant with a 20

1 Although the motion is noted for consideration on June 30, 2023 (see id.), the court sees 21 no reason to delay issuing a decision on the motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 (authorizing the court to construe the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive 22 determination of every action and proceeding”). 1 summons and a copy of the complaint and sets forth the specific requirements for doing 2 so. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Rule 4(m), which provides the timeframe in which service

3 must be effectuated, states in relevant part: 4 If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss 5 the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the 6 failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.

7 Id. 8 GS Holistic filed this action on March 19, 2023. (Compl. (Dkt. # 1).) As a result, 9 Rule 4(m)’s 90-day deadline for effectuating service of process expired on June 17, 2023. 10 Fed. R. Civ. P 4(m). GS Holistic represents that it only recently realized that it had not 11 yet served Defendants due to an organizational oversight and has since taken steps to 12 complete service. (Mot. ¶¶ 2-6.) GS Holistic now asks the court to extend the Rule 4(m) 13 deadline by 60 days to allow it to perfect service on Defendants “either personally or by 14 publication.” (Id. ¶ 6.) 15 The court finds that GS Holistic has not demonstrated good cause for its failure to 16 effectuate service before the Rule 4(m) deadline. Nevertheless, the court GRANTS GS 17 Holistic’s motion for a 60-day extension of the deadline to perfect service (Dkt. # 8).2 18 GS Holistic shall file proof of service on Defendants by no later than August 16, 2023. 19 Failure to do so may result in the dismissal without prejudice of GS Holistic’s claims 20

2 This order does not grant GS Holistic leave to serve Defendants by publication. If GS 21 Holistic seeks to serve Defendants by publication, it must file a motion for leave to do so. See Pascua v. Heil, 108 P.3d 1253, 1257 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005) (explaining the standard for granting 22 leave to serve a defendant by publication in Washington). 1 against Defendants. Further extensions of the deadline to serve Defendants will not be 2 granted absent exceptional circumstances.3

3 Dated this 20th day of June, 2023. 4 A 5 6 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 3 Under Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 10(e)(3), the law firm, mailing address, and 20 telephone number of the attorney preparing the paper should be printed or typed at the bottom of each page of a motion or other filing. In addition, Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 10(e)(5) requires line numbers in the left margin of each page of a motion or other filing. GS Holistic’s 21 motion does not comply with these rules. (See Mot.) Accordingly, the court ORDERS counsel for GS Holistic to carefully review the court’s local rules and to ensure compliance with those 22 rules in all future filings. Failure to comply with the court’s local rules may result in sanctions.