Gryphon Domestic VI, LCC v. APP International Finance Co., B.V.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gryphon Domestic VI, LCC v. APP International Finance Co., B.V.

15 A.D.3d 274, 792 N.Y.S.2d 14, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1688

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.3d 274 (Gryphon Domestic VI, LCC v. APP International Finance Co., B.V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gryphon Domestic VI, LCC v. APP International Finance Co., B.V., 15 A.D.3d 274, 792 N.Y.S.2d 14, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen E. Freedman, J.), entered July 29, 2004, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to hold the nonparty witnesses in contempt of court (CPLR 5251) for disobeying a restraining notice, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant judgment debtors’ bondholder lists and exchange [275]*275offers were disseminated by the nonparty witnesses in the course of the latter’s restructuring of the debtors’ obligations. Inasmuch as these were not assignable or transferable interests subject to restraint (CPLR 5201 [b]; 5222), plaintiff judgment creditors have failed to show noncompliance with the restraining notice. Concur — Buckley, EJ., Saxe, Friedman, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen E. Freedman, J.), entered July 29, 2004, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to hold the nonparty witnesses in contempt of court (CPLR 5251) for disobeying a restraining notice, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant judgment debtors’ bondholder lists and exchange [275]*275offers were disseminated by the nonparty witnesses in the course of the latter’s restructuring of the debtors’ obligations. Inasmuch as these were not assignable or transferable interests subject to restraint (CPLR 5201 [b]; 5222), plaintiff judgment creditors have failed to show noncompliance with the restraining notice. Concur — Buckley, EJ., Saxe, Friedman, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.3d 274, 792 N.Y.S.2d 14, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gryphon-domestic-vi-lcc-v-app-international-finance-co-bv-nyappdiv-2005.