Gryder v. Century 21/Oviedo Realty, Inc.

665 So. 2d 1134, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 70, 1996 WL 2273
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 1996·No. No. 94-1694·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wanda Gryder appeals a final judgment rendered after a non-jury trial in favor of the appellee who acted as her broker in a transaction in which she sold a parcel of real property. Unfortunately, a substantial portion of the selling price was secured by a purchase money second mortgage that was foreclosed by a first mortgagee when the buyer defaulted. The first mortgage was quite large because it encumbered not only the property that Gryder sold, but also surrounding property that was acquired simultaneously with the closing of Gryder’s property. The gravamen of Gryder’s complaint on appeal is that the trial court erred when it found: (1) that her broker did not act as a dual agent for both the buyer and'Gryder, (2) that the broker adequately advised her during changes to the three forms of contracts that were presented to her, and (3) that she was adequately advised of the risk attendant to taking a second mortgage.1

The record reflects many disputed factual contentions that were resolved against Gry-der by the trial court and the judgment is supported by the evidence. We find no reason to disturb the decision of the trial court. Marshall v. Johnson, 392 So.2d 249 (Fla. 1980).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, C.J. and W. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gryder v. Century 21/Oviedo Realty, Inc., 665 So. 2d 1134, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 70, 1996 WL 2273 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

665 So. 2d 1134 (Gryder v. Century 21/Oviedo Realty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hillcrest Pacific Corp. v. Yamamura
727 So. 2d 1053 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)