Gruver v. Gill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gruver v. Gill

220 S.W.3d 371, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 382, 2007 WL 656905

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 6, 2007

DocketED 88728

StatusPublished

This text of 220 S.W.3d 371 (Gruver v. Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gruver v. Gill, 220 S.W.3d 371, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 382, 2007 WL 656905 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William R. Gruver, Jr. (“Gruver”) and Cathy L. Gruver (“spouse”), collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs” appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their petition against Daniel L. Gill (“coworker”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI