Gruttemeyer v. Gruttemeyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gruttemeyer v. Gruttemeyer

285 A.D. 1185, 141 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7098

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 31, 1955

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 285 A.D. 1185 (Gruttemeyer v. Gruttemeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gruttemeyer v. Gruttemeyer, 285 A.D. 1185, 141 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for separation on the grounds of abandonment and nonsupport, defendant appeals from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and complaint dismissed, without costs. The findings of fact are affirmed, and additional new findings are made as indicated herein. In 1931, plaintiff married one William Lilley in Canada, where they resided. In 1943, Lilley obtained a separation from plaintiff herein in a Canadian court. Plaintiff herein was served in that action but defaulted in pleading. In 1949, while a resident of this State, plaintiff herein went to Florida to commence a divorce action against Lilley. Defendant herein made the arrangements for the trip and recommended an attorney to plaintiff herein. Her only stay there was for a few days either at the end of December, 1949, or in the early part of January, 1950, during which time she signed papers which, when eventually submitted to the Florida court, purported to show that she had signed and acknowledged said papers before a Florida notary in August, 1950. Lilley was served only by constructive service and did not appear in the Florida action, in which a final decree of divorce was entered in August, 1950. Plaintiff and defendant herein were married in Virginia in 1951. They were then, and are now, residents of this State; Lilley was and is a resident of Canada. Since plaintiff had a living husband, from whom she was not legally divorced at the time of her marriage to defendant, her- marriage to defendant is invalid. Defendant is not estopped from asserting the invalidity of the Florida divorce by his conduct in its procurement. Plaintiff, having failed to meet the burden of establishing that she is defendant’s wife, is not entitled to a legal separation from him. (Fischer v. Fischer, 254 N. V. 463.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for separation on the grounds of abandonment and nonsupport, defendant appeals from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and complaint dismissed, without costs. The findings of fact are affirmed, and additional new findings are made as indicated herein. In 1931, plaintiff married one William Lilley in Canada, where they resided. In 1943, Lilley obtained a separation from plaintiff herein in a Canadian court. Plaintiff herein was served in that action but defaulted in pleading. In 1949, while a resident of this State, plaintiff herein went to Florida to commence a divorce action against Lilley. Defendant herein made the arrangements for the trip and recommended an attorney to plaintiff herein. Her only stay there was for a few days either at the end of December, 1949, or in the early part of January, 1950, during which time she signed papers which, when eventually submitted to the Florida court, purported to show that she had signed and acknowledged said papers before a Florida notary in August, 1950. Lilley was served only by constructive service and did not appear in the Florida action, in which a final decree of divorce was entered in August, 1950. Plaintiff and defendant herein were married in Virginia in 1951. They were then, and are now, residents of this State; Lilley was and is a resident of Canada. Since plaintiff had a living husband, from whom she was not legally divorced at the time of her marriage to defendant, her- marriage to defendant is invalid. Defendant is not estopped from asserting the invalidity of the Florida divorce by his conduct in its procurement. Plaintiff, having failed to meet the burden of establishing that she is defendant’s wife, is not entitled to a legal separation from him. (Fischer v. Fischer, 254 N. V. 463.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 1185, 141 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gruttemeyer-v-gruttemeyer-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack