Grutacap v. Woulluise

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

Grutacap v. Woulluise

11 F. Cas. 98, 2 McLean 581

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

DecidedOctober 15, 1841

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 11 F. Cas. 98 (Grutacap v. Woulluise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grutacap v. Woulluise, 11 F. Cas. 98, 2 McLean 581 (circtdmi 1841).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This action was brought on a promissory note, dated New York, payable at the Detroit City Bank, for $1,232, with the current rate of exchange, on the city of New York, to be added thereto. In the declaration, there was an averment of the current rate of exchange, when the note became due. The court think the difference in exchange, between Detroit and New York, may be recovered on this note; and, unless the parties shall agree on the amount, the question will be referred to a jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This action was brought on a promissory note, dated New York, payable at the Detroit City Bank, for $1,232, with the current rate of exchange, on the city of New York, to be added thereto. In the declaration, there was an averment of the current rate of exchange, when the note became due. The court think the difference in exchange, between Detroit and New York, may be recovered on this note; and, unless the parties shall agree on the amount, the question will be referred to a jury.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F. Cas. 98, 2 McLean 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grutacap-v-woulluise-circtdmi-1841.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack