Grutacap v. Woulluise

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

Grutacap v. Woulluise

11 F. Cas. 98, 2 McLean 581

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan·Decided October 15, 1841·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This action was brought on a promissory note, dated New York, payable at the Detroit City Bank, for $1,232, with the current rate of exchange, on the city of New York, to be added thereto. In the declaration, there was an averment of the current rate of exchange, when the note became due. The court think the difference in exchange, between Detroit and New York, may be recovered on this note; and, unless the parties shall agree on the amount, the question will be referred to a jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This action was brought on a promissory note, dated New York, payable at the Detroit City Bank, for $1,232, with the current rate of exchange, on the city of New York, to be added thereto. In the declaration, there was an averment of the current rate of exchange, when the note became due. The court think the difference in exchange, between Detroit and New York, may be recovered on this note; and, unless the parties shall agree on the amount, the question will be referred to a jury.

Grutacap v. Woulluise, 11 F. Cas. 98, 2 McLean 581 (circtdmi 1841).

Pincite

11 F. Cas. 98 (Grutacap v. Woulluise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related