Gruskin v. Holiday Pools of Broward, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gruskin v. Holiday Pools of Broward, Inc.

448 So. 2d 523, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11972

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 29, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1125

StatusPublished

This text of 448 So. 2d 523 (Gruskin v. Holiday Pools of Broward, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gruskin v. Holiday Pools of Broward, Inc., 448 So. 2d 523, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11972 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

We agree in large measure with the trial court’s final judgment. However, in making its award, the trial court failed to deduct $1,200.00, which was the sum one of appellee’s owners testified would be necessary to complete the pool in question. In Adams v. Dreyfus Interstate Development Corp., 352 So.2d 76 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) this court was concerned with a breach of contract precipitated by a landowner’s refusal to make a partial payment. It was there said that:

[t]he measure of damages is the amount which the innocent party would have received if the contract had been performed, less any deductions for expenses not yet incurred.

Id. at 78.

Accordingly, we remand with direction to enter a corrected final judgment, nunc pro tunc May 2, 1983, reflecting the principal sum due of $6,754.88, together with interest thereon from March 1, 1982, at 10% per annum.

HURLEY, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI