Grushaw v. Grushaw

281 A.D. 1031, 121 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4226
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 4, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 1031 (Grushaw v. Grushaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grushaw v. Grushaw, 281 A.D. 1031, 121 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Action by a wife to annul a marriage. When the case came on for trial on January 3, 1952, neither plaintiff nor her attorney was present because of illness. The Trial Judge swore the defendant but took no testimony and adjourned the ease to February 28, 1952, for trial. On that date both attorneys appeared and plaintiff’s attorney moved to discontinue the action, which was denied and exception taken. Plaintiff’s attorney then stated that he was not ready with his proof and that he would require two weeks to prepare. Defendant’s attorney consented and the court adjourned the case to March 13, 1952. On that day neither the plaintiff nor her attorney appeared, and attempts, made at the court’s direction, to reach plaintiff’s attorney were unavailing. The court granted a motion by defendant’s attorney to dismiss on the merits. On October 7, 1952, plaintiff entered a formal order denying her motion to discontinue, which had been made orally and denied on February 28, 1952. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits and from the order denying her motion to discontinue the action. Appeal from judgment dismissed, without costs, and without prejudice to a motion to amend the judgment so as to indicate that the dismissal was not on the merits, if plaintiff be so advised. The judgment was entered on plaintiff’s default. No appeal lies from a default judgment. Order affirmed, without costs. By accepting the adjournment until March 13, 1952, plaintiff abandoned her right to appeal from the order denying her motion to discontinue the action. Furthermore, the formal order denying the motion was not entered until more than six months after the motion had been denied and after the default judgment had been entered. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aiello v. Baldasare
17 Misc. 2d 449 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 1031, 121 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grushaw-v-grushaw-nyappdiv-1953.