Gruppo v. ICOM Information & Communications, Inc.

Second Circuit

Gruppo v. ICOM Information & Communications, Inc.

126 F. App'x 45

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 19, 2005

DocketNo. 04-3974

StatusPublished

This text of 126 F. App'x 45 (Gruppo v. ICOM Information & Communications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gruppo v. ICOM Information & Communications, Inc., 126 F. App'x 45 (2d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.

Defendant-counter-claimant-appellant ICOM Information & Communications, Inc. (“ICOM”) appeals (1) certain aspects of the Opinion and Order of the District Court, entered July 2, 2003, Gruppo, Levey & Co. v. ICOM Info. & Communications, Inc., 01 Civ. 8922(JFK) 2003 WL 21511943 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 1, 2003); and (2) the final judgment of the District Court, entered by the clerk of the District Court on July 1, 2004, finding in favor of plaintiffs-counter-defendants-appellees Gruppo Levey & Co. and GLC Securities Corp. on their quantum meruit claim.

We have reviewed all of ICOM’s arguments on appeal, and — substantially for the reasons carefully and comprehensively explained by the District Court in (1) the July 2, 2003, Opinion and Order disposing of the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, 2003 WL 21511943; (2) the Opinion and Order entered October 6, 2003, denying ICOM’s motion for reconsideration, Gruppo, Levey & Co. v. ICOM Info. & Communications, Inc., 01 Civ. 8922(JFK) 2003 WL 22283812 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2003); and (3) the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, entered June 29, 2004 — we hold that each is without merit.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.

Defendant-counter-claimant-appellant ICOM Information & Communications, Inc. (“ICOM”) appeals (1) certain aspects of the Opinion and Order of the District Court, entered July 2, 2003, Gruppo, Levey & Co. v. ICOM Info. & Communications, Inc., 01 Civ. 8922(JFK) 2003 WL 21511943 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 1, 2003); and (2) the final judgment of the District Court, entered by the clerk of the District Court on July 1, 2004, finding in favor of plaintiffs-counter-defendants-appellees Gruppo Levey & Co. and GLC Securities Corp. on their quantum meruit claim.

We have reviewed all of ICOM’s arguments on appeal, and — substantially for the reasons carefully and comprehensively explained by the District Court in (1) the July 2, 2003, Opinion and Order disposing of the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, 2003 WL 21511943; (2) the Opinion and Order entered October 6, 2003, denying ICOM’s motion for reconsideration, Gruppo, Levey & Co. v. ICOM Info. & Communications, Inc., 01 Civ. 8922(JFK) 2003 WL 22283812 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2003); and (3) the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, entered June 29, 2004 — we hold that each is without merit.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 F. App'x 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gruppo-v-icom-information-communications-inc-ca2-2005.