GRUNZKE v. Mason

District Court of Appeal of Florida

GRUNZKE v. Mason

78 So. 3d 573, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8387, 2011 WL 2202157

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 8, 2011

Docket1D10-5206

StatusPublished

This text of 78 So. 3d 573 (GRUNZKE v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

GRUNZKE v. Mason, 78 So. 3d 573, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8387, 2011 WL 2202157 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rebecca Zellner Grunzke appeals (1) an amended supplemental final judgment entered August 25, 2010, which incorporated a modification of the final judgment entered December 28, 2009, nunc pro tunc December 17, 2009; (2) an order dated December 28, 2009, approving the parenting plan; (3) an order dated February 24, 2010, appointing a parenting coordinator; (4) an order dated January 13, 2009, nunc pro tunc December 11, 2008, disposing of various pending motions; and (5) an order dated February 1, 2010, denying rehearing. Based on our review of the extensive record in this matter and the brief submitted by appellant, we find no reversible error committed below. Accordingly, we affirm all judgments and orders for which appellant seeks review.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rebecca Zellner Grunzke appeals (1) an amended supplemental final judgment entered August 25, 2010, which incorporated a modification of the final judgment entered December 28, 2009, nunc pro tunc December 17, 2009; (2) an order dated December 28, 2009, approving the parenting plan; (3) an order dated February 24, 2010, appointing a parenting coordinator; (4) an order dated January 13, 2009, nunc pro tunc December 11, 2008, disposing of various pending motions; and (5) an order dated February 1, 2010, denying rehearing. Based on our review of the extensive record in this matter and the brief submitted by appellant, we find no reversible error committed below. Accordingly, we affirm all judgments and orders for which appellant seeks review.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 So. 3d 573, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8387, 2011 WL 2202157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grunzke-v-mason-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack