Gruntz v. County of Los Angeles
177 F.3d 729, 1999 WL 528419
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 20, 1999·No. No. 97-55379·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, In re Gruntz, No. 97-55379, slip op. at 4611, 177 F.3d 728 (9th Cir. May 19, 1999), is withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gruntz v. County of Los Angeles, 177 F.3d 729, 1999 WL 528419 (9th Cir. 1999).
177 F.3d 729 (Gruntz v. County of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re: Charlene Gruntz
Ninth Circuit, 2012
James Stewart Hamilton v. Alicia Hamilton Herr
Sixth Circuit, 2008
Hamilton v. Herr
540 F.3d 367 (Sixth Circuit, 2008)
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Veneman
490 F.3d 725 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Siskin v. Complete Aircraft Services, Inc. (In Re Siskin)
258 B.R. 554 (E.D. New York, 2001)
Lenke v. Tischler (In Re Lenke)
249 B.R. 1 (D. Arizona, 2000)
In Re Toussaint
259 B.R. 96 (E.D. North Carolina, 2000)
In Re Glass
240 B.R. 782 (M.D. Florida, 1999)