Grunt v. Weissman
151 A. 729, 107 N.J. Eq. 107, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 533
Opinion
The decision of this case in the court below turned on findings of fact which were peculiarly within the province of the vice-chancellor, who concluded that the complainant had not shown a case entitling him to the relief prayed, and dismissed the bill. With that conclusion we agree, and the decree is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grunt v. Weissman, 151 A. 729, 107 N.J. Eq. 107, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 533 (N.J. 1930).
151 A. 729 (Grunt v. Weissman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.