Grunt v. Weissman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Grunt v. Weissman

151 A. 729, 107 N.J. Eq. 107, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 533

DecidedOctober 20, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 151 A. 729 (Grunt v. Weissman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grunt v. Weissman, 151 A. 729, 107 N.J. Eq. 107, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 533 (N.J. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

The decision of this case in the court below turned on findings of fact which were peculiarly within the province of the vice-chancellor, who concluded that the complainant had not shown a case entitling him to the relief prayed, and dismissed the bill. With that conclusion we agree, and the decree is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The decision of this case in the court below turned on findings of fact which were peculiarly within the province of the vice-chancellor, who concluded that the complainant had not shown a case entitling him to the relief prayed, and dismissed the bill. With that conclusion we agree, and the decree is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 A. 729, 107 N.J. Eq. 107, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grunt-v-weissman-nj-1930.