Grunig v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grunig v. New York City Transit Authority

66 A.D.2d 706, 411 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13983

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.2d 706 (Grunig v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grunig v. New York City Transit Authority, 66 A.D.2d 706, 411 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 31, 1978, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, vacated, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, without costs or disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $125,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The damages awarded by the jury were excessive to the extent indicated. Concur-Birns, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Fein and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 31, 1978, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, vacated, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, without costs or disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $125,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The damages awarded by the jury were excessive to the extent indicated. Concur-Birns, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Fein and Markewich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.2d 706, 411 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grunig-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1978.