Grunewald v. Alexander Avenue Kosher Restaurant Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grunewald v. Alexander Avenue Kosher Restaurant Corp.

297 A.D.2d 661, 747 N.Y.2d 192, 747 N.Y.S.2d 192, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8425

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 661 (Grunewald v. Alexander Avenue Kosher Restaurant Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grunewald v. Alexander Avenue Kosher Restaurant Corp., 297 A.D.2d 661, 747 N.Y.2d 192, 747 N.Y.S.2d 192, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ contention that the jury verdict was inconsistent is unpreserved for appellate review (see Clements v Lindsey, 237 AD2d 557). In any event, the jury verdict finding that the defendant driver was negligent but that his negligence was not a proximate cause of the accident is consistent with the evidence elicited at trial (see Schaefer v Guddemi, 182 AD2d 808; Rubin v Pecoraro, 141 AD2d 525). In addition, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J.P., H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ contention that the jury verdict was inconsistent is unpreserved for appellate review (see Clements v Lindsey, 237 AD2d 557). In any event, the jury verdict finding that the defendant driver was negligent but that his negligence was not a proximate cause of the accident is consistent with the evidence elicited at trial (see Schaefer v Guddemi, 182 AD2d 808; Rubin v Pecoraro, 141 AD2d 525). In addition, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J.P., H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 A.D.2d 661, 747 N.Y.2d 192, 747 N.Y.S.2d 192, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grunewald-v-alexander-avenue-kosher-restaurant-corp-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack