Home/Ohio Court of Appeals/Grundstein v. Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.

Grundstein v. Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.

107 N.E.2d 366, 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 251, 1951 Ohio App. LEXIS 838
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 12, 1951
DocketNo. 4680
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 N.E.2d 366 (Grundstein v. Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grundstein v. Suburban Motor Freight, Inc., 107 N.E.2d 366, 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 251, 1951 Ohio App. LEXIS 838 (Ohio Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT.

Submitted upon motion by the appellee herein seeking an order dismissing the appeal on questions of law and fact for the reason that no appeal bond had been filed within the time provided by §12223-6 GC. The record supports the facts stated and the motion will therefore be sustained. The appellant will be granted leave to perfect the appeal on questions of law in accordance with the supplement to Rule VII of this court.

HORNBECK, PJ, WISEMAN and MILLER, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SyQuia v. United States
124 F. Supp. 638 (Court of Claims, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 N.E.2d 366, 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 251, 1951 Ohio App. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grundstein-v-suburban-motor-freight-inc-ohioctapp-1951.