Grundstein v. Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.

107 N.E.2d 366, 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 251, 1951 Ohio App. LEXIS 838
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided September 12, 1951·No. No. 4680·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT.

Submitted upon motion by the appellee herein seeking an order dismissing the appeal on questions of law and fact for the reason that no appeal bond had been filed within the time provided by §12223-6 GC. The record supports the facts stated and the motion will therefore be sustained. The appellant will be granted leave to perfect the appeal on questions of law in accordance with the supplement to Rule VII of this court.

HORNBECK, PJ, WISEMAN and MILLER, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grundstein v. Suburban Motor Freight, Inc., 107 N.E.2d 366, 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 251, 1951 Ohio App. LEXIS 838 (Ohio Ct. App. 1951).

107 N.E.2d 366 (Grundstein v. Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SyQuia v. United States
124 F. Supp. 638 (Court of Claims, 1954)