Grundstein v. Spanagel
894 N.E.2d 328, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1467
This text of 894 N.E.2d 328 (Grundstein v. Spanagel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Grundstein v. Spanagel, 894 N.E.2d 328, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1467 (Ohio 2008).
Opinion
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s exigent motion for stay and to immediately issue an alternative writ,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
894 N.E.2d 328, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grundstein-v-spanagel-ohio-2008.