Grundstein v. Spanagel

894 N.E.2d 328, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1467
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 2008·No. 2008-1731·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s exigent motion for stay and to immediately issue an alternative writ,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grundstein v. Spanagel, 894 N.E.2d 328, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1467 (Ohio 2008).

894 N.E.2d 328 (Grundstein v. Spanagel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.