Grundmeyer v. Placit
This text of 68 Mo. App. 228 (Grundmeyer v. Placit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff recovered judgment for $1 for damages in October, 1895. He thereupon at once filed a motion for new trial, which the court sustained. Prom the order sustaining said motion the defendant took an appeal, but failed to perfect it by filing in this court either a transcript of the record or a clerk’s certificate showing the judgment and allowance of the appeal. The plaintiff now produces the clerk’s certificate showing the above facts, and prays that the judgment of the lower court granting him a new trial be affirmed. No cause to the contrary [229]*229being shown, it is ordered that the judgment of the trial court awarding to the plaintiff a new trial be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 Mo. App. 228, 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grundmeyer-v-placit-moctapp-1896.